BahVideo.com
Lecture 17 - Distributive Justice and the Welfare State, The Moral Foundations of Politics
Lecture 17 - Distributive Justice and the Welfare State The Moral Foundations of Politics | BahVideo.com
Watch Lecture 17 - Distributive Justice and the Welfare State,  The Moral Foundations of Politics

Lecture 17 - Distributive Justice and the Welfare State, The Moral Foundations of Politics

0 of 5 Stars
The main focus of today’s discussion is Rawls's third and most problematic principle, the difference principle, which states that income and wealth is to be distributed "to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged individual." This stems from the logic that what is good for the least advantaged individual will be good for the second-least advantaged, and the third, and so on. But what if slightly benefiting the least advantaged person comes at a huge cost to others? Professor Shapiro explores Rawls's defense. It is important to note that Rawls is not trying to give marginal policy advice, or even determine whether socialism or capitalism benefits the least advantaged (which he leaves to empirics), but trying to determine the basic structure of society. However, Professor Shapiro shows that the difference principle is not necessarily radical in the redistributive sense when compared with Pareto or Bentham, but it is radical in a philosophical sense. Rawls argues that the differences between individuals are morally arbitrary--it's moral luck that determines the family one is born into, what country one is born in, or one's capacities. However, some of the consequences are unsavory. Although Rawls tries in vain to exclude what one chooses to make of one's capacities, could not effort, or capacity to work, fall into this sphere as well? What is to be said of two equally intelligent people, one of who works hard and gets A's while the other lies on the couch and watches ESPN all day?
Channel: ACADEMIC EARTH
Video Length: 0
Date Found: May 25, 2011
Category: Educational
Date Produced:
View Count: 0
Flag
Related Videos
Lecture 26 - Final Q&A,  Epidemics in Western Society | BahVideo.com
ACADEMIC EARTH

Lecture 26 - Final Q&A, Epidemics in Western Society

0 of 5 Stars
May 25, 2011
Professor Snowden describes the final exam, and takes questions from students.
Lecture 6 - Smallpox (I): 'The Speckled Monster',  Epidemics in Western Society | BahVideo.com
ACADEMIC EARTH

Lecture 6 - Smallpox (I): 'The Speckled Monster', Epidemics in Western Society

0 of 5 Stars
May 25, 2011
In the eighteenth century, smallpox succeeded plague as the most feared disease. The two maladies, however, are very different. While plague is a bacterial disease, smallpox is viral. Plague is spread by rats and fleas, smallpox is transmitted by contact and airborne inhalation. Unlike plague, ...
Lecture 16 - The Rawlsian Social Contract,  The Moral Foundations of Politics | BahVideo.com
ACADEMIC EARTH

Lecture 16 - The Rawlsian Social Contract, The Moral Foundations of Politics

0 of 5 Stars
May 25, 2011
The next and final Enlightenment tradition to be examined in the class is that of John Rawls, who, according to Professor Shapiro, was a hugely important figure not only in contemporary political philosophy, but also in the field of philosophy as a whole. The class is introduced to some of the ...
Lecture 11 - Independence,  The American Revolution | BahVideo.com
ACADEMIC EARTH

Lecture 11 - Independence, The American Revolution

0 of 5 Stars
May 25, 2011
In this lecture, Professor Freeman discusses the Declaration of Independence and sets the document in its historical context. The Declaration was not the main focus of the Second Continental Congress, which was largely concerned with organizing the defensive war effort. The Congress had sent ...
Lecture 25 - SARS,  Avian Inluenza, and Swine Flu: Lessons and Prospects, Epidemics in Western Society | BahVideo.com
ACADEMIC EARTH

Lecture 25 - SARS, Avian Inluenza, and Swine Flu: Lessons and Prospects, Epidemics in Western Society

0 of 5 Stars
May 25, 2011
SARS, avian influenza and swine flu are the first new diseases of the twenty-first century. They are all diseases of globalization, or diseases of modernity, and while relatively limited in their impact, they have offered dress-rehearsals for future epidemics. As information about SARS spread ...
: advertisement :
Featured
Content
Featuring websites that enhance the internet user’s experience.

Like
Like